ANOTHER TAKE

[Julian de'Courcy]

Another take from a spot I often stop at.


Untitled_Panorama13333 by Julian de Courcy, on Flickr

 

[Pete Askew]

What wonderful light, so subtle. Love it.

 

[Brian Moore]

The greens look subdued on my screen. However, lovely shot, Julian.

 

[Julian de'Courcy]

What wonderful light, so subtle. Love it.

Thanks Pete, I'd have liked to have got the colours more subtle, without losing to much zazazoom . This was as close as I could get on this occasion.

 

[Julian de'Courcy]

The greens look subdued on my screen. However, lovely shot, Julian.

thank you Brian , seems as if it is showing the colours I aimed at.

 

[Ivar Dahl-Larsen]

Very good work Julian, you also managed to get Brian and myself to see it your way as well as the one down in Germany.

 

[Peter McCullough]

Beautiful Julian, very simplistic landscape, uncluttered. Superb!

 

[Rob MacKillop]

The sky is wonderful, and I love the wiggly-waggly-woo of the landscape.

 

[Aldous Lau]

A very simple photo, great shot Julian

 

[Pete Askew]

The sky is wonderful, and I love the wiggly-waggly-woo of the landscape.

I see yours has prescribed the same ones!

 

[Julian de'Courcy]

Thank you all.
I had another version a lot less subtle. This one got into Flickr explore with over 7000 views the fist day which tells a story I guess. I prefer the first image.

TREGISKEY by Julian de Courcy, on Flickr

 

[Ivar Dahl-Larsen]

Thank you all.
I had another version a lot less subtle. This one got into Flickr explore with over 7000 views the fist day which tells a story I guess. I prefer the first image.

TREGISKEY by Julian de Courcy, on Flickr

So do I, but, it's good.

 

[Pete Askew]

Me too.

 

[Steve Boykin]

Both are really good but I prefer the first one also. I think the light in the first one is really gorgeous.

 

[Brian Moore]

First one for me, too. But the second has its own kind of brooding appeal.

Edit: I think the sky is quite stunning in the second one. Perhaps if the light on the landscape were lifted slightly the second would then become my favorite.

 

[Julian de'Courcy]

Me too.

Both are really good but I prefer the first one also. I think the light in the first one is really gorgeous.

First one for me, too. But the second has its own kind of brooding appeal.

Edit: I think the sky is quite stunning in the second one. Perhaps if the light on the landscape were lifted slightly the second would then become my favorite.

thank you all. I have noticed in some competitions, and across flickr, some types of images do far better then others as regards to being acknowledged positively. Most often these are not so close to my own taste. Being very saturated can be one of the elements that is regarded as a positive . Reading about someone who wins a lot of competitions he said, he worked to a formula, one being saturation levels, another being that the image has to work as a thumbnail size as well as expanded , none of this surprises me but interesting. .

 

[Paul Lange]

I think the first version is a corker. The 2nd OK but not for me. I think the first just has so much more to hold my interest.

 

[Julian de'Courcy]

I think the first version is a corker. The 2nd OK but not for me. I think the first just has so much more to hold my interest.

I fully Agree Paul

 

[Beth Carter]

i really love the first one. great colors and tones. ominous and brooding without being overbearing. i love the natural, subtle colors of that one.