My New (Possibly Temporary) Toy

Brian Moore

Moderator
A couple of weeks ago I had posted about my interest in picking up a Fuji MF camera.

Here's my original post:
http://www.realphotographersforum.com/critique-advice/12182-fuji-mf.html

Well, KEH had a free shipping deal last week and so that compelled me to take the plunge and I bought the GM670 they had.

To be honest, I'm a bit disappointed in the condition of the camera. The glass is good, and the camera appears perfectly functional (I'll know more on that by the end of the day) but esthetically it has seen far better days. The finish has flaked off in many areas and some of the retaining screws as well as the secondary shutter release button are rusted over.

Now, I admit I bought a "Bargain" grade camera. (It was the only 670 they had, and I like that format and I like the flexibility of interchangeable lenses and on top of that I'm seeing posts on websites suggesting these models aren't available all that often.) Now, there is nothing about the condition of the camera that doesn't fit within the parameters of KEH's definition for their Bargain rating. However, perhaps I just expected more because of KEH's reputation for evaluating their used equipment generously,...a reputation that was reinforced in my mind by the condition of the "bargain" Mamiya C33 I bought from them which was in delightful condition for its age.

Suffice to say the GM670 is a bit rough. I have 14 days to return it. Not sure yet what I'll do, and I hope the thing grows on me, but at the moment I am not enchanted.

It's a beast, by the way. The lens is the size of a bazooka.

 
It's called character, Brian. Looks like it has lived, seen some life. Looking forward to what you will produce with it, as I think it will suit your style.
 
It's called character, Brian. Looks like it has lived, seen some life. Looking forward to what you will produce with it, as I think it will suit your style.
"Character", eh...? Very diplomatic of you, Rob! ;) I just finished a test roll which I'll process later this afternoon. We'll see if the old beast still lives or not. Anyway, thanks Rob!
 
Thanks for the suggestion, Pete, but on closer inspection under good daylight conditions I see there is rust on the film door frame where the paint has flaked off and also on the film door hinge.
 
Its a bit like when people keep their games boxes in pristine condition, you don't play the box you play the game, just make sure its light tight and go out and shoot :)
 
That doesn't sound so good. Looks like it has been stored somewhere damp. Any fungus visible on the optics?

No Pete. The glass is good.

Here's a picture of Meg (acting the mug a wee bit because I'm shooting a fotie while she's on the phone to her sister). This is the first image I shot with the camera. When I shot it I thought it would be over-exposed. The light from the window was rather bright and I recall having the lens wide open (f3.5). Although I don't recall the shutter speed I do remember thinking "maybe too much light." But as you can see, this portrait is OK. However, all the outdoor shots I took were very over-exposed. (See the 2nd shot below, which I exposed at f5.6 and 1/125 to bring out the detail in the shadow. But the shadow turned out a lot brighter than I expected and the sky is blown out. I'm going to shoot another roll of the same film tomorrow and see if I get the same results. If I do, then I think the shutter speeds are off.





- - - Updated - - -

Rust is a step too far for me ...

I'm with you on that Hamish; after all, rust never sleeps.
 
Well, it's useable, and you would get used to its foibles, but the Mamiya 7 blows it out of the water, I'm afraid.
I agree on both counts, Rob.

- - - Updated - - -

The portrait is nice though and the eyes and the fact that you can't see the phone makes the pose rather classical I think.

Thanks, Pete. I admit the portrait did turn out nice.
 
Back
Top