Rob MacKillop Edinburgh Correspondent May 18, 2017 #1 Canon AE1-P. First is with a macro lens, Canon 50mm, 3.5. Second is with a Canon 24mm, 2.8. XP2 film. I was thinking what an interesting form it had for a skyscraper...
Canon AE1-P. First is with a macro lens, Canon 50mm, 3.5. Second is with a Canon 24mm, 2.8. XP2 film. I was thinking what an interesting form it had for a skyscraper...
Dave Farnes Well-Known Member May 18, 2017 #2 Yes that would make for an interesting design, some architects do go for organic shapes.
Dave Farnes Well-Known Member May 19, 2017 #4 Rob MacKillop said: Gherkins spring to mind, Dave... Click to expand... Indeed they do...
Brian Moore Moderator May 20, 2017 #5 With that first one the first thing I thought of was the Chrysler Building in New York. The second reminds me of the Gherkin in London. (I think that's what they call it.) You've gotten inside my head with these "skyscrapers" Rob! Very nice.
With that first one the first thing I thought of was the Chrysler Building in New York. The second reminds me of the Gherkin in London. (I think that's what they call it.) You've gotten inside my head with these "skyscrapers" Rob! Very nice.
Pete Askew Admin May 20, 2017 #6 What an interesting (and effective) pair of shots. Chrysler was exactly what sprang into my mind too.
What an interesting (and effective) pair of shots. Chrysler was exactly what sprang into my mind too.
Rob MacKillop Edinburgh Correspondent May 20, 2017 #7 Chrysler? Someone else pre-ripping me off? It's getting out of hand!