Street Shot

Brian Moore

Moderator
XAKodakUltramax800--012.jpg


Actually I wouldn't call it "street photography" per se, although it was taken on a street. However, I know everyone in the shot so it lacks anonymity factor that street photography tends to have.

Olympus XA with Kodak Ultramax 800 film. (I think I had the aperture too wide; this, along with the high ASA, may explain the graininess in the shot.)
 
There is something quite satisfying about this picture Brian. Firstly it is a nice shot of the man in the foreground. The slightly washed-out colours and grain are aesthetically pleasing in their own right. But there is something more. For most people this is a street shot as we don't know the people and it is not obvious that they are known to you. Probable yes, but by no means certain. But none of that is enough to make it as interesting as it is. There is not much actually going on (no one is being mugged, threatened or kissed even! Just a bit of social interaction), so it's not that. However, I think it might be the geometry of the composition. The diagonal that runs from the 'main man's' head through the people behind, the ladies bag and into the corner. The way the leg of the guy with the light trousers echoes this and the yellow thing that pulls the eye downwards. And finally you notice Honda. I guess where you work. So now I have started putting what little I know about the photographer into it. I can guess it is colleagues on their way back to work after a lunch celebrating something maybe (birthday). So now I have a story to fit to the image.
 
Very nicely deduced, Pete. Have you thought of detective work as a career? A certain Mr. S. Holmes has quite the reputation for deductive reasoning. I think you could give him a lesson or two.

Yes,...I work at Honda and yes it was just after I had lunch with my little group and yes, it was in honor of a birthday. (I'm a wee bit surprised that you didn't identify the birthday person, but I'm sure that is because your natural humility restrained you for fear of appearing show-offy; I'm also sure you know it was the fellow in red on the right of the photo whose birthday we celebrated.;))

This is the photo I was referring to in our discussion of earlier today. When I saw it I was immediately reminded of the work of _______. (<--fill in the blank, Pete.)

The gentleman in the foreground is my associate, Rodney. The word splendid springs most readily to mind when I think of Rodney's contribution to our little team. I've featured Rodney before. It was he who was seated in Rosa Parks' seat on Rosa Parks' bus when I took the pictures of it at The Henry Ford Museum back in October.

And by the way,...thank you for the comments Pete!
 
Exactly, Pete. Meyerowitz. (Does it also seem to you in some ways similar to the sample image of his work that you posted the other day?)

Any thoughts on why you like the shot though?
I like that everyone in the image has something going on--apparantly independent of each other. Even the two chaps in the center, although they were at the time talking with one another, seem independently active in some way. And I also like the Rodney is so prominent; that works well for me aesthetically.

However, as I mentioned earlier this morning, I don't think I would have given this image a second thought if you hadn't introduced me to Meyerowitz. I certainly wouldn't have posted it to RPF. My eyes have been opened a little more through our discussion of street photography.

Thanks again Pete!
 
Isn't that interesting. It is the geometry of your shot shot that grabs me first. But for you it is the content and in that context I can see the parallels in the image from Joel Meyerowitz that you refer to. Otherwise much less so as I see a colour shot taken in the street but do not see an association. When I think of photograph by Meyerowitz, it is the principle character (lady in hat) that grabs me and I like the shot because it looks for a moment like it could be a fashion shot (as with Bailey in New York in the early '70s). Then you realise it isn't and it is the guy looking back at her that is interesting. Is that what Joel saw (the interaction) or is the man looking to see what Joel is shooting? But when I think of your description of your own shot I see the various independent elements in this shot too; woman in hat; man looking back; lady on corner etc. This has its own element of interest and may well be, at least in part, what Joel describes as the compositional elements 'coming together' or 'heading together' as there are elements of anticipation in his working style.

It'll be interesting to see what the others see in this shot of yours.
 
Hmm...
As it stands, it bothers me a little ...
I've had this thread open for a while on my phone trying to work out what wrong with it ..
I worked it out by accident !
I quite often use the way the iPhone works to crop pictures to see how different framing would look!
This time I left the picture on the screen got distracted, looked back at the screen and I must have swiped it a bit ...
Anyway pointlessly long story short this is what I saw on the screen

8f0c58f8.jpg


That works better for me ... Poor birthday boy is superfluous to my requirements

It's because he is an outward pointing element on the edge of the frame I think ... And that he is red!
 
For me the fact that Rodney is looking out of the frame is the key aspect of the picture. He is clearly engaged in some form of communication or activity, as can be deduced from his big grin, with someone or something beyond.
 
Back
Top