Texas Leica

Chris Dodkin

West Coast Correspondent
I added to the Fuji stable today, after a foray on Fleabay, going old school and film - and keeping with the whole rangefinder vibe.

8058327176_c01bd0c5f8_b.jpg


Managed to find a mint model in VA, really well looked after, and doesn't appear to have shot many rolls in it's lifetime.

8058327743_f6e6942f67_b.jpg


Fixed 65mm lens - and aperture and shutter speed are set on the lens barrel.

8058327620_cf56a4a09e_b.jpg


All metal construction with a lovely knurled grip - you can see where the X-Pro1 design came from.

8058327750_07e9e908e3_b.jpg


Classic rangefinder viewfinder with bright lines and a focus patch - nice and bright, seems easy enough to use.

8058328211_d1a1d4bda4_b.jpg


No need for a 'Thumbs-up' on this model - it has an actual film advance lever!

8058327946_38d2c0e0de_b.jpg


Just like the X-Pro1, Fuji have helpfully labeled it as 'Professional' :D

8058327470_53a3a6b060_b.jpg



So why is it called the Texas Leica I hear you ask? :confused:

Well, you know what they say - everything's bigger in Texas....




Well.....







Here is the GSW690II compared to my Fuji X100 :eek:




8058327627_d482a52eee_b.jpg


Yes, it really is HUGE!

It's not 35mm, it's a 6x9 Medium Format camera - using 120 film - hence the super-sized physique.

8058328495_e7a50cdf6d_b.jpg


It shoots just 8 frames on a roll of 120 film - 8 frames!

8058328244_999b5206b5_b.jpg


Looking forward to getting some film through it and seeing what a 6x9 negative can produce.

8058342854_679aed3df9_b.jpg


The 65mm Lens is a wide angle on a MF camera, like a 28mm Lens on a 35mm Camera.

8058342966_b193d94d1f_b.jpg


It's a whole new world! :)


The GW690 series from Fuji has a long history, and a strange beginning.

Legend has it that Japanese bus tour companies required a large format camera to take souvenir group shots of tourists. 35mm didn't have the quality, so Fuji developed the 690 camera to provide an easy to use, MF camera. That was back in 1978.

Earlier Fuji MF cameras had had interchangeable lenses, but sales had shown that only two lens lengths ever sold (std and wide) so the GW690 was made with a fixed 90mm f/3.5 standard lens, and the GSW690 with a fixed 65mm f/5.6 wide lens.

The GW690II and GSW690II followed in 1985, with only minor revisions to the previous model.

Later GW690III and GSW690III models were also produced, but these had a 'modern' plastic exterior, instead of the now so popular all metal construction we see in today's X series Fujis.

Fuji also made 6x8 and 6x7 models - with very similar dimensions and features.

Talking of dimensions - the GSW690II body is 120mm x 200mm x 131mm - Weight 1,480g

I will not be hanging this bad boy on a wrist strap! :D

The camera has no electronics what so ever - it's all manual, and has no light meter.

It has a leaf shutter, and two shutter release, one for landscape, one for portrait orientation.

That's as far as I've got so far - will test it out with some Ilford 50 ASA, and I also have some Fuji Velvia 50 ASA coming from Amazon.

Looking forward to seeing what the extra real estate will provide - for reference, here's 6x9 compared to 35mm

6x6v35.jpg


Scans will come in at 4815x7588 pixels from my local lab - I'll post as soon as I have something to show :cool:
 
Lovely. I've been wanting one of these for a while. I love the 6x9 size, too. The negs are the size of playing cards!

(That same camera also comes in a 6x4.5 and 6x7 versions, I do believe.)
 
Nice one Chris!
ive been watching so many of these on eBay since I bought my 645
Can't wait to see some images ... I bet they are STUNNING!!

- - - Updated - - -

What does the film counter say?

(are you going to make this into an article or shall I?)
 
Brian - 6x7 and 6x8 in this body style, 6x4.5 in a slightly squarer model (I believe Hamish has/had one?)

There's a current model available in Japan which is 6x6 and 6x7 switchable - it's called the GF670W and has a wide angle 55mm ƒ:4,5 Fujinon lens and a huge price tags some where north of $3,0000

I can't find it in the US or anywhere else for that matter, just a couple for sale on EBAY from HK

$(KGrHqR,!i!E4)I2lUDgBON5Hnwu3g~~0_3.JPG


This appears to be the same camera as the Voigtlandaer Bessa III WIDE - retailing at $2999

gross_haupt_w.jpg


Pete - I looked at the 90mm and figured that I'd be doing more landscape than anything else, and that the wide version would be best suited - of course the wide models are more expensive! :(

Hamish - I've been checking out images on Flickr and they're a mixed bag - difficult to judge full image quality from smaller sized JPEGs, but some do look very promising.

Counter is at around 150 (from memory - camera is upstairs and I'm feeling lazy) - which equates to 1500 frames, assuming it's not been tampered with.

Based on physical condition I'm thinking it's accurate. So that would mean it's had fewer than 200 120 films through it in it's life :)

Rob - it was the best I saw on EBAY for condition, and was better than I hoped when it actually arrived. Most of the one's for sale are from Japan, and some of them have seen some action!
 
Here's Martin Schoeller, shooting a 6x9 Fuji for a series in Time Magazine

[video=youtube;1M7rSayb05M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1M7rSayb05M[/video]

Gives you a good idea of relative camera size

Note to self... need Tigers for the next shoot! :D

- - - Updated - - -

Just for scale...

7626331890_b3951aeae6_b.jpg
 
Gave the camera it's first outing at dawn this morning

8059645011_7ed5b6e7e8_b.jpg


Bit fiddly remembering to do all the manual stuff, like focussing! :D
 
I wonder who's collection of rangefinders that is??
you got any photos to how yet or is that too much to ask this soon?
 
Well I have just added another camera I want in my life lol :D Everyone loves MF resolution :D

I think someone worked out the megapixel equivilents for 35mm and the 120 resolution (my Kodak 620 also runs 8 shots per roll) I was like......8!?!

Here is what was posted on another forum when they worked out the number of MPs for the films:

"Here ya go. A 35mm black and white negative has nearly 40 billion silver halide (silver salt) crystals. When a silver halide crystal is exposed to light it converts to black metallic silver which, when developed, stays in the negative as the unexposed silver halides are washed away in the fix.

A 35mm neg is 24mm x 36mm in size. That's 46.3 million crystals per square millimeter. A medium format negative, lets just use 645 format for example would contain at 46 million crystals per square millimeter a grand total of just over 124 billion crystals.

Now, the 6x4.5 neg has three times the halides as the 35mm neg. However, when both are enlarged to the same size, say 8x10, you are focusing your negative image in the enlarger onto the paper. By doing so the grain in a properly focused 645 neg will be a third the size as that of a properly focused 35mm neg.

And don't even get started on large format. By the numbers a 4x5 neg would have just under 600 billion crystals. 5x7 over a trilion. 16x20 . . . I boggles the mind. "

So it seems you have a 124BP camera :D

Looks amazing though, im tempted to get a MF camera that actually has changable shutter speeds and aperture (unlike the Kodak!)
 
I wonder who's collection of rangefinders that is??
you got any photos to show yet or is that too much to ask this soon?

Shot a roll of Ilford PanF 50, one of Fuji Velvia 100, and one of Kodak Porta 400 today, but will not be able to get dev until Mon/Tue

Also grabbed a roll of Fuji Neopan 100 to try - figured I'd try a bunch of different films and see how they work for me.
 
Back
Top