Ivar Dahl-Larsen
Well-Known Member
I actually thinks it handles what I want it to quite adequately under all circumstances even in Jpeg, as here.
Just for Show Another test, of XT1 with kit.
- Thread starter Ivar Dahl-Larsen
- Start date
Pete Askew
Admin
It most certainly seems to.
Ivar Dahl-Larsen
Well-Known Member
And that goes for my Fuji xe2 also, which is evidently on its way to this household. A one and its kit lens Pete. Having one kit lens, I sell the new one quite cheaply and by that the new xe2 does not cost me much. Approximately £ 250 equivalent to NOK ( Norwegian kroner ), a bargain with its 4,0 firmware update, similar to the xt1. There aren't many XE2s out there anymore. I guess Fujina shall have a mate, Fujic may turn out to be his name.
Rob MacKillop
Edinburgh Correspondent
Hard to improve on a Fuji jpeg, I think. Unless you are making big prints, they are probably all you need. This image is beautiful.
Why do you need an XE2 when you have the XT1? What does it bring that the XT1 doesn't have?
Why do you need an XE2 when you have the XT1? What does it bring that the XT1 doesn't have?
Ivar Dahl-Larsen
Well-Known Member
Well thank you Rob, xe2 has almost all that xt1 has except water resistance and smaller viewfinder. Secondly I do not like to change lenses and I have more or less always operated with two cameras. These two are small as you know in size and light. Perfect for street photography. And with one wide angle on one and a normal to short tele on the other, primes you know, I have covered almost all eventualities. Now if you take a look at Nick Lukey in his web site the big picture gallery, you shall find that he does wonderfully well with xt1, jpeg and large gallery enlargements. Now that's how I see it, works much faster that way especially as I mentioned, in the streets. Them two cameras operate the same way. Even 'my brain can handle that
Rob MacKillop
Edinburgh Correspondent
Understood.
Similar threads
