Ivar Dahl-Larsen
Well-Known Member

To whom it may interest.Cameras, monitors, ipads and tablets of any form has a colour setup in sRGB, which is convenient and easy adaptable especially for the web where we all are. But sRGB does not contain as many colours as RGB or even proRGB. Many photographers who usually use a professional printer business outside of their homes prefer RGB so do I, also since pro printers convert RGB to CMYK. When pictures are produced / processed in RGB they will show a colour cast which may appear unnatural to all photographers who operate with sRGB on their monitors and cameras, to some extent bluish or well saturated on the web. I do not write this as a defence but as an explanation to why some of you may have perceived my pictures as extra colourful. If in my case, I should change all this to sRGB, my monitor shall have to be calibrated again into sRGB, my cameras too. And all my photography from previous days shall appear to me as you see them on the web. One may of course ask oneself, what is most important to each individual? Do I often print my pictures outside of home and when? Or do I produce my pictures for the web mostly. I started out in RGB because I printed at times for exhibitions and for sale. If I was to start today, I probably would have started out in sRGB for convenience sake and adaptability to the rest of the web.
Here is a picture that at least Tom would recognize and as I use as an illustration, and only he can tell me in return whether it appears as he saw it or whether it has got this colour cast that I have talked about here. On my monitor it appears as I saw it across the street.