@Brian Moore For my taste the third one is quite interesting, also for the very well-chosen camera angle, the first one is bordering on the abstract, but as a viewer it is good to be challenged sometimes, the second one, on the other hand, is too digitally artifacted. But that's just a personal opinion, as always.

To my eyes the third one is excellent! Lots of drama and dynamics 👍
 
Last edited:
@Brian Moore For my taste the third one is quite interesting, also for the very well-chosen camera angle, the first one is bordering on the abstract, but as a viewer it is good to be challenged sometimes, the second one, on the other hand, is too digitally artifacted. But that's just a personal opinion, as always.

To my eyes the third one is excellent! Lots of drama and dynamics 👍
Gianluca thank you for your observations and opinions. The third is the one I like best, too.
 
Brian, you've made them look human, all three but especially the third. Digital manipulation gets some criticism for being 'not real', so it's a wonderful irony that you have helped render clay more human.
Never thought of it like that, Rob. Thank you.
 
Back
Top