Thanks Rob. No, I did play with various versions but this one straight from SPP as a mono conversion, I did general global adjustments but not much at all as I liked it how it was. The sun was just away from the wall though and I think he caught a little, all luck.I like this one a lot. Has a nice glassy sheen to it, which I love. Have you highlighted the lad? He looks perfectly lit. Great pic.
Kind of you to offer Rob , but can you imagine though how far I'd sink in the mud. I'll get it done but need to wait for the tide to sync , I will will be interested to see the quality of Film in this scenario if nothing else.I'll send you my Rb67!
Maybe that's what he intended to do Julian, let you sink in. Envy is a dangerous drive you know as I here do. Envy you these two wonderful images. Right up my lane you know and please do not blame the quality on the cameraKind of you to offer Rob , but can you imagine though how far I'd sink in the mud. I'll get it done but need to wait for the tide to sync , I will will be interested to see the quality of Film in this scenario if nothing else.
Ivar, yes I was not critical of the output of the camera to wish to try film on this shot. This B+W (on this screen anyway) the rendering I like a lot, my technical term for this output is 'the sticky gooey black treacle cake affect'.The right light gets it. The idea of not jumping in with film is. I am careful about shooting too many 120 rolls off,which is very few, so wait until I have a subject that, in my opinion will bring a decent film shot and such a shot here would be as much about the rendering of the film as the subject matter.Maybe that's what he intended to do Julian, let you sink in. Envy is a dangerous drive you know as I here do. Envy you these two wonderful images. Right up my lane you know and please do not blame the quality on the camera
Thank you BrianThat first one is a cracker, Julian!
Thank you Pete.Another suburb shot from down there, Julian. The first is simply wonderful.
Thank you Rob.Suburb, indeed...