Help Needed Choosing a Lens

Rob MacKillop

Edinburgh Correspondent
I want (eventually) to have a really nice portrait lens for face and upper body shots (i.e. not full length) and wondered which of the Fuji lenses - including the ones not yet released - might be best for that. Here is their roadmap of lens releases for this year:

Fuji Lens Roadmap.jpg

Of course, with a mount I could choose from a wider range. If that is the case, which mount and which lens. I'm looking at an upper limit of £500, preferably much lower!

Suggestions welcome.
 
you know how often i shoot portraits, so if someone else offers a suggestion you should listen to them. but i like the 60mm as a portrait lens. i think the 55-200mm might be a little more versatile since it's a zoom lens, but no idea what it will look like in terms of image quality.

x-pro 1 and 60mm in low light.
 
The 60mm or the 56mm Rob - The 60mm is a macro as well, so that's good if you like doing macro work, but does mean the AF is slower

The 56mm will be an out and out portrait lens - so should have faster AF, and also has wider apertures for narrow DOF effects

The 60mm does a nice job today if you can't wait - and it does half decent macros, but can have internal reflection issues with bright backlighting at times

I will be getting the 56, as and when it arrives - specifically for portrait use
 
Thanks, Chris. Just the info I was looking for. I bet it will be expensive, though. Still, I have time to save.

- - - Updated - - -

Thanks for asking, Pete.
 
There will be a 56mm f/1.4 later this year, which I expect will be very popular with portraitists. Capable of very shallow depth of field. With a field of view equivalent to an 84mm on full frame, it allows one to work closely for head-shots while maintaining a pleasant perspective. Available now is the 60mm f/2.4. I compared numbers of exposures, and found that I use it 40% of the time, with the 35mm used 34% and the 18mm 26%. It has close-focusing to 1:2 and a macro formula that is very flat field, producing minimal fall-off in the corners. Even at f/2.4, it is amazingly sharp and contrasty.

When I took delivery of the third lens, I went to a meeting in a classroom. Half the lights were turned off, for better projection, so I was shooting in very low light. After the meeting, we went for pizza so I shot in available darkness. I was testing the lenses, but also the X-Pro1 as a candid decisive-moment tool, trying to capture character and emotion. I included essential EXIF metadata.

AmiCUE on X-Pro1

I also had occasion to shoot a hockey game using the 60mm exclusively. I found the combination of OVF and lens to be ideal.

Hockey With the Fujifilm X-Pro1

So yes, I am very enthusiastic over this lens. I have also used it for nature and panoramas. It adds a very nice compressing on the z-axis for the latter. I am not obsessive over shallow depth of field, so really have no interest in the upcoming 56mm.

There are adapters for pretty much every lens in a focusing mount and I read a message from someone using an enlarging lens on a bellows. So any lens between 50mm and 90mm could certainly be adapted for this purpose. With the shorter focal lengths, one can work closers for more intimate portraits, with the long producing distance and formality. Of course, you lose auto-focus and aperture control for lenses that are controlled by the camera bodies. Some mounts attempt to address the later. Evidently, the difference between really cheap adapters and the most expensive is not of much significance. In any case, there are huge numbers from which to choose.

Metabones has announced development of a FX mount adapter with optics that will allow one to mount a lens and get the same field of view as if it were mounted on a full-frame camera. In so doing, you pick up an extra stop. Thus a 90mm f/2.8 keeps its field of view instead of that of a 135mm, but becomes an f/2.0! It only works with SLR lenses, Nikon and Canon initially.
 
Chris, do you have any experience of using a manual focus Eos or similar lens on the Fuji. I'd wondered about a Samyang 85mm f1:1.4 with an adapter for Rob. What do you think?

As long as the lens has manual aperture control (which the Canon EF lenses don't) you could use it with an adapter.

The EF lenses have electronic aperture control, so end up being mostly useless on the X-Pro1/X-E1, as you cannot vary the aperture whilst shooting :(

You can just leave them wide open and use an adapter with it's own aperture blades (manual type) - but I figure this is a rather nasty solution to the problem.

The Voigtlander 14mm lens I tried in LA was nice - and of course had it's own aperture control - so it's all do-able with a little research.

From the look of it, the Samyang has aperture on lens - correct?

Samyang_85mm.jpg


It would of course be more like a 120mm tele on the X-E1 - which isn't an issue for portraits, as long as you have the space to shoot at the longer focal length
 
Back
Top