Thanks a lot Rob. What do you think about the brownish tone? Too brownish maybe?Very grainy, and all the better for it. I like how the trees cut a diagonal, one to the other, across the frame.
Thanks a lot, Tom. I think I posted another picture not that long ago that you commented on regarding the tone being a little too strong. It was a similar tone to this one I think. Anyway, when I posted this I was thinking of that comment. I think your judgement was correct then and now too. Thanks, Tom.It's a very fine picture of the building Brian with good impact.
I'm in two minds over the inclusion of the trees in this instance and while I like the actual tone itself I feel it is too strong in parts of the image while nicely subtle in other parts.
You're going to get me in trouble, Rob.So, Brian, you just posted it to annoy Tom?
Thanks a lot, Chris. I'm sure you've seen the City Hall building, Chris. You'd recognize it for sure if you saw the top of it in the picture. Thanks again.I rather like the tension created by the 'random' bits of nature vs the angular, man-made structure
I must have completely failed to see this building in LA Brian, probably been past it focussed on the bumper in front!
I like the tone - feels suitably timeless
Never thought of it that way. But, it is Los Angeles after all.looks like the end is near, brown tones in the sky never bode well.
Thank you, Pete. It does look like smoke, doesn't it? (I wonder if they were voting on the mayor that day?) Much appreciated, Pete.Wonderful Brian and I like the cloud / smoke. And for me, the toning works well.
Thanks, Pete. Very much like an SX-70, I think, except that it takes the 600 film.No, a Polaroid SRL 690.