I agree that PS etc can give a lot of control to the photographer which, in theory, will allow them to reveal the image that they visualised. Of course, often things get a bit out of hand and things are adjusted / manipulated more because they can than because they should. Sticking to ones vision and having self control are, as you have alluded to elsewhere Larry, a key attribute. Of course there are times, just as there are in a darkroom, that something emerges that one just didn't expect.
As for maintaining control with film, one can always develop and print the films oneself. The skills from a darkroom are not so different to those which the software emulates although of course certain techniques are much easier to perform and some are genuinely unique to a digital route. Of course a digital 'darkroom' is somewhat easier to set up and takes a lot less space! But I must say that, given that I spend much of my working life staring at a screen, working in a darkroom is a wonderful relief. I also like the small variations that hand printing can bring. Even with the most detailed notes and disciplined technique, two prints are rarely truly the same. For example, simulating a 'lith' print is relatively simple in PS/Nik etc and you can get the same effect every time. But somehow they lose the magic of this difficult to control process.
I work with both digital systems (from FF DSLR and RF to capture backs on 5x4) and film. I enjoy image making from both, but my heart belongs to film, or at least the analogue process.