One of two out of 225 shots which were okay..

Garry Lee

Well-Known Member
Shooting running training last night in HOPELESS light. Shooting with Canon 1Div and Sigma 300 f2.8 with monopod, 6400 iso -1 exposure compensation (need this in this track's lighting). Occasionally you get a good one in these circumstances. This is full of noise but I love it myself. Shutter speed 1/100 and the girl is the no.2 800m runner in Ireland. She was going flat out in this..


Laura 438 by gearoidmuar, on Flickr
 
often using these high isos means you are shooting in dodgy light...
the combo of shooting in dodgy light, and the way that cameras saturation is reduced at high isos results in this feel to an image
I think it is a feel that can work well, in this case i think it does!
It sorta reminds me of of a cimematic grading that might be used in this sort of circumstance, it works very well with the pained expression on her face i think!
 
Worth the effort I'd say

So is it lack of contrast effecting AI Servo that causes issues, or just the general lack of light to keep shutter speeds up?

Or both! :D
 
Worth the effort I'd say

So is it lack of contrast effecting AI Servo that causes issues, or just the general lack of light to keep shutter speeds up?

Or both! :D

Two things. Lack of light meaning long exposures, relatively and in this case they were mostly training in tight groups making it hard to get individual shots.
6400 is as far as produces reasonable photos with 1Div. You can shoot higher but it's a noisefest!
You'll always get a few reasonable ones in these circumstances.
The AF in the Sigma 300 is really good, as good as any of my Canon lenses.
 
I love the kind of (accidental) impressionistic burst of colour near her head. You can't see these things when you're shooting but if you shoot enough, you get some.
 
I'd shoot 225 exposures to get a a few that we're good. This shot works well for me. I might like a little smother bokeh but the comp and color is nice.
 
Such is the nature of shooting sports. A number of years back, Rob Galbraith's site did an article on Sports Illustrated Magazine's workflow when covering the SuperBowl game that year. Though somewhat dated now, it is still a good read.

Rob Galbraith DPI: Sports Illustrated's digital workflow

In summary the magazine had eleven of the world's top sports shooters on the ground, and in all there were over 16,000 exposures to generate the cover and the handful of pictures in the article. A sports shooter has zero control over the subjects. Any time it looks like a peak of action is about to occur, one must shoot. If you wait to see if it will make a good shot, it won't—because it is already history. Timing is everything—a moment early or late, and the picture is boring. Even when you absolutely nail the peak of action, the picture may still not tell much of a story, so gets culled. One can not afford to squander even a single opportunity, because it may be the only exciting picture of the lot.

Covering major league baseball in the US (baseball was only invented so that cricket would no longer be the world's least exciting sport) I was getting nothing. Zero close plays. Seven innings and not a usable shot. Then came the seventh inning stretch. I looked over my shoulder and the crowd was standing and stretching—with one exception. Well, he was stretched out over five seats, sleeping in the afternoon sun! That was the shot of the game. It not only made the cover of the sports section, Associated Press picked it up and it ran in papers around the world the next morning.

Shooting ISO6400 was not even on the radar back then. For night-games it was mostly Tri-X pushed to ISO800-1200. I have a print beside me shot a year or so back at ISO12,800 with far less noise than the grain of the Tri-X. With sports, content is everything. Hit the moment when the image is definitive of the game, and no one sees the noise. A bit of blur is seldom a problem and often tells the story. Covering auto-racing, a high shutter-speed shows cars parked on the track. Slow shutter-speed and panning blurs the background into streaks of light and dark, blurs the wheels and tells everyone that car was haulin'. However, when it crashes, you want the highest shutter-speed you can get.

Bokeh in sports is generally a necessary artifact of a lack of light, and often ruins the image. The story of most team sports is the interaction between the teams. If only the ball carrier is in focus, the story is almost always lost. It works in this case, because the person is running solo. Were it a race, you would lose the expressions of intensity and perhaps desperation of the other runners. It might make a great portrait of the winner, but would lose as a story-telling sports shot.
 
Thanks for that contribution, Larry. I agree with everything you said!. I use bokeh to capture a single runner well. I do use shorter lenses and smaller stops for action stuff etc. It's mostly running that I shoot, or triathlon, but I have shot hurling (Irish field game) and occasionally rugby.
I laugh when people criticise the "composition" of a running shot. These are people who've never done it, because it's just chance!
I've used 24-105, 100 f2, 70-200 f4, 300 f2.8 and 400 f5.6 lenses for it.
 
Thanks for that contribution, Larry. I agree with everything you said!. I use bokeh to capture a single runner well. I do use shorter lenses and smaller stops for action stuff etc. It's mostly running that I shoot, or triathlon, but I have shot hurling (Irish field game) and occasionally rugby.

I thought that hurling was what the Irish do in the field behind the shebeen after too much young potcheen on a Saturday night. That which is referred to as "upchucking the cookies" here in Canada. :D
 
Well we occasionally use the word with that meaning, but more commonly call it puking, or in Cork slang, gawking (we also use that for staring). The Aussie term, a technicolour yawn is probably the best. Where in Canada are you? I've been there a couple of times, in Cape Breton Island, cycling, and at a class reunion (2 of my classmates settled there) in Newfoundland. I loved Newfoundland.
 
Back
Top