People photograph everything and nothing

A quote from Hugh Laurie on Desert Island Discs that thought rather insightful.

"People photograph everything and nothing - no interaction is deemed to have actually happened unless somebody has a picture of it," he said.

"Nobody is satisfied with having met a person without having a picture to prove it."

He added: "I think that is odd and I think it's so odd I think it might actually be starting to alter the way we think about each other and the way we think about general day-to-day social interaction."

BBC News - Hugh Laurie tells of Stephen Fry reunion idea
 
Thanks Pete. Interesting. On my woodworking forum there is a saying-No photo...didn't happen. I believe that walking without a camera is just walking...with a camera...it's seeing.
 
Snapshots and photographs serve different purposes, even though they both originate with cameras. Snapshots memorialize events and people. If they are of good image quality, it is a bonus, not a requirement. They are precious to the family, but the world in general will only react if they are old or quaint. If you line up the family in front of the wonder of the world, it says you were there, even if the wonder is mostly covered by Mama's massive flapping upper arms. It is both a memorial and a validation. The artificiality of lining up the family is not detrimental in any way. The self-timer, if used, allows even the camera person to be in the picture. Snapshots provide a vital visual history of the milestones in the lives of those in them.

A photograph may benefit from context, but in essence has been shot to be appreciated by both friends and total strangers to the content. They preserve the photographer's vision of the event, more than memorializing the people and event itself. Both serve a vital role in society.
 
I feel we are moving towards technology which will allow everything we see to be stored without need of a handheld camera.
Perhaps when our memory isnt quite what it used to be, we can review everything our eyes saw, reliving joys as well as sorrows.
 
I feel we are moving towards technology which will allow everything we see to be stored without need of a handheld camera.
Perhaps when our memory isnt quite what it used to be, we can review everything our eyes saw, reliving joys as well as sorrows.

While not yet practical, the technology foundation at least exists right now. Many mobile devices contain one or more cameras, capable of both still and motion. It should be no problem to add this capability to a device such as Google's enhanced reality glasses, for a continuous information stream of what you see. Storage becomes less and less expensive, while gaining speed. SDXC cards are up to 256GB! While WiFi hot-spots are ubiquitous, most require passwords now. If universal access ever comes about, the local card could easily upload the stream to the cloud at every opportunity. Cell phone technology may be a better route. In any case if the will is there, it is very nearly doable. Local and cloud storage is approaching free. At the moment, a terabyte is going for $50-$80US.

The USA agencies involved in domestic surveillance give us a clue of just how enormous big data can be, clearly dwarfing the vast server farms of Amazon and Google. Certainly, not everyone would buy into recording a life-stream, so the need for storage would continue to evolve, rather than present an immediate storage crisis. Compression of data is amazing now, and I expect research will continue to cram far more into much more into smaller, more efficient packets.

While big data is certainly the wave of the present and future, organization and search would be the problem. With wearable data capture, perhaps one could tag things verbally, while the capture devices also tags by time. Still reliving a random memory from years back when the date is forgotten, could be a problem. With a terabyte of images, only careful indexing and cross referencing through ACDSee Pro keeps them easily accessible. They are of course discrete moments in time. Finding a precise point in the stream of life may be more of a challenge.

Of course, all your mistakes would also be recorded, and may be subject to subpoena. Run a stop-sign last week? The surveillance camera on the corner caught it, and your life-stream would confirm it, leaving you no defense. Then there was that chance encounter with the blonde in the bar when your wife was off visiting her mother, the war department was in session...
 
I feel we are moving towards technology which will allow everything we see to be stored without need of a handheld camera.
Perhaps when our memory isnt quite what it used to be, we can review everything our eyes saw, reliving joys as well as sorrows.

""We are only beginning to learn what to say in a photograph. The world we live in is a succession of fleeting moments, any one of which might say something significant. When such an instant arrives, I react intuitively. There is, I think, an electronic impulse between my eye and my finger. But even this is not enough. I dream that someday the step between my mind and my finger will no longer be needed. And that simply by blinking my eyes, I shall make pictures. Then, I think, I shall really have become a photographer" - Alfred Eisenstaedt
 
Back
Top