Peter O'Connor
Well-Known Member
This is what I was thinking...!
Final jpeg sorted, looking lovely.
Now, resize it and start pulling them lovely balanced pixels about... Tragedy no!
So, would it be wiser to resize the image first and then beautify your pixels?
Although, Does PS have to create pixels when enlarging? (Extrapolating is it?)
If so my idea falls apart as you'd be manipulating extrapolated pixels instead of true..
Hhhmm, Is enlarging more destructive than downsizing?
If so, Resize unedited original to the biggest size you will print (40"x30" for example)
then process as normal. BIG lovely file.. Export smaller copies off as needed, no loss off IQ..
OR AM I TALKIN COMPLETE ****??
Everything and anything on the above please.
Final jpeg sorted, looking lovely.
Now, resize it and start pulling them lovely balanced pixels about... Tragedy no!
So, would it be wiser to resize the image first and then beautify your pixels?
Although, Does PS have to create pixels when enlarging? (Extrapolating is it?)
If so my idea falls apart as you'd be manipulating extrapolated pixels instead of true..
Hhhmm, Is enlarging more destructive than downsizing?
If so, Resize unedited original to the biggest size you will print (40"x30" for example)
then process as normal. BIG lovely file.. Export smaller copies off as needed, no loss off IQ..
OR AM I TALKIN COMPLETE ****??
Everything and anything on the above please.