Brian Moore
Moderator
I would have filed this in the "Paranormal" forum but I don't think we have one.
My daughter Caitlin graduated from the University of California at Riverside last weekend. I managed to get a seat close enough to get a half decent fotie. Due to an unbelievable stroke of good luck, the sun was peaking through the trees and casting a magnificent sliver of golden light directly onto the patch of ground where (and most importantly when) she stepped down from the stage and paused to have her photo taken by the official photographer. I grabbed the following image with my Canon 7D and Tamron 18-270:
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fbrianmoore.zenfolio.com%2Fimg%2Fs9%2Fv87%2Fp1776827647-5.jpg&hash=2116a30d8ace2658c4b4dff206bc8b78)
Now here's where the strange bit enters.
On the day of the graduation ceremony I packed 4 cameras. The aforementioned Canon 7D, the Minox 35GT I bought from Hamish, my Superheadz Blue Ribbon toy camera, and a "Cintar by Argus 587" that I had just that morning discovered among a stack of junk point & shoot film cameras I own. The latter had film in it, and the film counter showed "1" so I figured I'd take it with me and fire it willy-nilly at this and that just to use up the film. I do not know where or when I got this junk P&S, nor did I at all remember it when I discovered it.
We arrived at the school and I shot the Cintar roll before the commencement began. I got the film developed this week. I discovered that several of the negs were double-exposed.
Now, I'm not a fan of double-exposure images. Indeed, I do not ever recall having deliberately attempted a double-exposure. But the following image just blew me away. The background shows one of the buildings at UC Riverside. As I mentioned, I was just shooting willy-nilly this and that. However, in the foreground is a superimposed image of my daughter Caitlin--the graduate (who is now 21 years of age)--at about the age of 12!
How very odd!
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fbrianmoore.zenfolio.com%2Fimg%2Fs9%2Fv91%2Fp1645612864-4.jpg&hash=88b21c4f02ad4824a93402006c44ae55)
My daughter Caitlin graduated from the University of California at Riverside last weekend. I managed to get a seat close enough to get a half decent fotie. Due to an unbelievable stroke of good luck, the sun was peaking through the trees and casting a magnificent sliver of golden light directly onto the patch of ground where (and most importantly when) she stepped down from the stage and paused to have her photo taken by the official photographer. I grabbed the following image with my Canon 7D and Tamron 18-270:
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fbrianmoore.zenfolio.com%2Fimg%2Fs9%2Fv87%2Fp1776827647-5.jpg&hash=2116a30d8ace2658c4b4dff206bc8b78)
Now here's where the strange bit enters.
On the day of the graduation ceremony I packed 4 cameras. The aforementioned Canon 7D, the Minox 35GT I bought from Hamish, my Superheadz Blue Ribbon toy camera, and a "Cintar by Argus 587" that I had just that morning discovered among a stack of junk point & shoot film cameras I own. The latter had film in it, and the film counter showed "1" so I figured I'd take it with me and fire it willy-nilly at this and that just to use up the film. I do not know where or when I got this junk P&S, nor did I at all remember it when I discovered it.
We arrived at the school and I shot the Cintar roll before the commencement began. I got the film developed this week. I discovered that several of the negs were double-exposed.
Now, I'm not a fan of double-exposure images. Indeed, I do not ever recall having deliberately attempted a double-exposure. But the following image just blew me away. The background shows one of the buildings at UC Riverside. As I mentioned, I was just shooting willy-nilly this and that. However, in the foreground is a superimposed image of my daughter Caitlin--the graduate (who is now 21 years of age)--at about the age of 12!
How very odd!
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fbrianmoore.zenfolio.com%2Fimg%2Fs9%2Fv91%2Fp1645612864-4.jpg&hash=88b21c4f02ad4824a93402006c44ae55)