Stripes!

I'm right. Your left.

Actually, Tom, you highlighted negatively what I saw as positive when taking the picture - the strong, aggressive lines of the trousers she is so proud to wear, and by contrast her softness, her shyness at being in the shot. It came out just as I saw it, and I think says a lot about her in her late teenage years, striding out into the world, yet still shy. She's Rhona. That's who she is.
 
I'm right. Your left.

Actually, Tom, you highlighted negatively what I saw as positive when taking the picture - the strong, aggressive lines of the trousers she is so proud to wear, and by contrast her softness, her shyness at being in the shot. It came out just as I saw it, and I think says a lot about her in her late teenage years, striding out into the world, yet still shy. She's Rhona. That's who she is.
Rob, having read the above I have a new understanding of the images and I'm sorry I got the names mixed up. I appreciate totally where you are coming from.
 
It's always a matter of taste and I feel, as one does when one tastes, that the middle one is of no significance unless you want to show two different facial expressions. And if that is the case, than the face should be sharper. Apart from all my "butts" I find the black and white work as ever, very good. Now don't let it go to your head Laddie, remember I am not too sick yet although I sound like an old goat. Hark!
 
Well, I've come to the controversy late! And I like them all. The first because it makes such a super abstract. The second because of the contrast (even without taking your comments about personality into account). And the the third because it has a sort of part feel to it for some reason. My favourite of the three? The second. :)
 
Back
Top