55-200 @ 55, 70, and approximately 150

[Steve Boykin]

Had to guess on the 150 since it goes from 135 to 200 with no marking in between. Oh well.

Hugo at 55, Ruby at 70, and Stanley at something between 135 and 200.

All straight out of the camera ISO 1000, max aperture which is 3.4, 4.0, and 4.4.

I'm not a good judge of these things but it seems like a pretty good lens.

 

[Paul Lange]

I think the second has come out particularly well Steve.

 

[Pete Askew]

Seems good to me and a fine crop of shots. As Paul says, the second has come out particularly well.

If you are processing in LR, does it not tell you the focal length under the histogram?

 

[Steve Boykin]

If you are processing in LR, does it not tell you the focal length under the histogram?

Well what do you know. It sure does. 148.5mm. Pretty close. It may tell you in the camera too. Apparently you have to upgrade the firmware for the camera. On the other zoom lens they included a little card with the firmware. This time they cheaped out and didn't do it. I'm too lazy but I'll try and do it tonight maybe..... You just can't get good service these days from these large corporate blood suckers.