Bluebells in the Hallerbos II - Too emotional to keep the camera stil....

[Rense Haveman]

Earlier this day, I posted some photo's of the Hallerbos. Besides normal photos, I shot some abstracts too. Anxious to know what you think!


Hallerbos abstract IV by Rense Haveman, on Flickr




Hallerbos abstract I by Rense Haveman, on Flickr




Hallerbos abstract II by Rense Haveman, on Flickr




Hallerbos abstract III by Rense Haveman, on Flickr

 

[Pete Askew]

I like these Rense, very much. No 2 and 3 work best i think as there is no deviation in the vertical blur which in the 1st and 3rd detracts a bit. Do you have more?

 

[Rense Haveman]

I like these Rense, very much. No 2 and 3 work best i think as there is no deviation in the vertical blur which in the 1st and 3rd detracts a bit. Do you have more?

Thank you Pete. Yes, I have many more. Kind of trial and error, so I make a lot of these things....

 

[Davie Hudson]

the bottom one works better for me , it has cleaner lines and seems more dreamlike for me

 

[Chris Dodkin]

Genius idea. Would not have thought to do this. I'm inspired!

 

[Rense Haveman]

Genius idea. Would not have thought to do this. I'm inspired!

Thank you. But it's not my own idea, not that you suggested such, but just to be sure. There's a set of great articles about landscape blurs on Luminous Landscape: Landscape Blurs

 

[Pete Askew]

Thanks Rense, that has been bugging me as I couldn't remember where I'd read the article. That was it.

 

[Paul Lange]

The last one just seems to draw you in and is not actually as challenging to look at than you first think. I keep finding myself going back and looking at it.

 

[Hamish Gill]

I think these work very well indeed!
I would say the last one with the most motion is the best ... more please!

 

[Lesley Jones]

I love them and with bluebells coming out around us now, you have inspired me to get out soon. I like them all, but I prefer no.2 because of the light in the background and the one, closer tree on the right hand side

 

[Rense Haveman]

Thanks a lot!