Comprehensive X100 Review

Hamish, that's where the modern Leica's really shine for handling - low light. OK, the files are noisy compare with the D3, but if you shoot intending them to be either B&W or can use the noise they are fine. This really came home to me over the last few days shooting in a very, very dim bar with the 85 1/1.4. Focusing manually was the best bet but nowhere near as simple as with the M9 and getting sharp images at full aperture was far from easy (mind, it being 4 AM and several beers later didn't help either!).
 
X100 First Impressions

My X100 arrived yesterday, just before I had to leave for a gathering of friends that happens every Saturday at a café. No time to look at the manual, just set it on aperture priority and began shooting. Over lunch, explored the camera and soon had it set up to my taste and fine-tuned to shooting in the café. Controls are completely straight forward and menus quite comprehensible for anyone experienced with high-end digital cameras. Clearly not a consumer camera, however. Slightly smaller than I had visualized, but still fits the hand nicely. Also fits in an old belt pouch. Hefty enough to hold steady, but of little noticeable weight in the pouch. Perfect carry-everywhere camera.

The retro design fascinated my friends, but once I started shooting, the camera was ignored. Shots of people just being themselves and living their lives with no sign of awareness of the camera—as I had hoped. Adequately fast. I hit the switch with my finger as I pull it from the pouch and it is ready to use by the time it reaches my eye. Focus is not as violently fast as my D700 with a contemporary lens, but fast and positive enough to be no problem. It is locked on well before the image can be composed.

For street shooting using the hyperfocal scale, one can set it on manual, choose an object within the desired range and push a button. It will lock onto the object and hold that distance until you push the button again. While it has a manual focusing ring, this is a far faster way to use manual focus. Of course, it has focus triggered by a half press as well as continuous focus.

It is all about the hybrid viewfinder. Both the Electronic Viewfinder (EVF) and Optical Viewfinder (OVF) can be set to display an enormous selection of information or kept very sparse. When using the OVF, the EVF projects the parallax sensitive frame lines and everything else you choose. While most rangefinders focus down to about a meter, the OVF is good to about 80cm where it runs out of parallax correction. Punch Macro and it switches automatically to the EVF for very close focus. The EVF has a resolution of 1,440,000 dots, and is very usable. It also has the conventional LCD monitor on the back which can be used like any other compact camera. However, a sensor near the viewfinder's eyepiece will switch between the monitor and viewfinder when you put your eye to it. Very nice. The viewfinder has diopter adjustment for individual eyes.

One can switch on a choice of three shutter sounds, or leave the camera nearly silent. You can hear the between-the-lens leaf shutter in a quiet room, but barely. Since it is a leaf shutter, flash will sync all the way to the fastest shutter speeds for fill flash outdoors. I shot available light yesterday at the café, but did play with fill flash afterwards. Works fine. There is also red-eye elimination, which I did not try.

No Adobe Camera RAW yet, so I chose to shoot RAW+JPEG. A RAW conversion program is included in the package, which I have not tried. The consensus on Fuji forums is that it is in the class of that included with Nikons—not quite as bad as a virus, but not great either. In the meantime, there is very comprehensive in-camera RAW conversion function. Any camera settings can be applied after the fact, in any combination. Totally non-destructive of the original exposure, and when shooting RAW+JPEG, the original JPEG is not overwritten. This includes film emulation—the camera will mimic the colours of Provia, Astia and Velvia films as well as B&W with and without red, green or yellow filters.

Speaking of filters, it has a switchable three EV neutral density filter built-in for those who want to shoot yet another cliché slow shutter-speed waterfall, or shoot at wide apertures in strong light.

It is not a D3 for shooting sports, so has a choice of three or five frames per second, with a buffer space for eight RAW or ten JPEGs. It will write faster to a Class 10 card than to a Class 6, so that is what I got. I doubt it writes at the full Class 10 speed, but that was not a problem. It is just not a camera that fosters a machine-gun approach to photography. I don't even use the D700 that way. The X100 practically screams "decisive moment". I used it exclusively on single-shot and that felt natural.

It has a few interesting bracket options beside the usual exposure bracket (up to 3.0EV), including ISO, dynamic range and film simulation brackets. While the camera could be used for HDR, I would probably stick with the D700 for that—a range of 9.0EV. On the same page are panorama and movie modes. In panorama mode, it has in-camera stitching, and it worked very well for the couple I tried. For serious panoramic work, I expect I will stick to the D700, but this could be handy. It has movie capability, which probably will be rarely used by me.

So far no complaints. The camera exudes quality and is very pleasant to use. One accepts the limitation of a built-in 35mm lens—which felt like the perfect choice—and finds an otherwise richly featured camera, ideal for candid, street and decisive moment photography. Unless you are Henri Cartier-Bresson reincarnated, it would probably not be a good choice as an only-camera. However, the D700 and a bunch of lenses is not exactly the most mobile of kits. This fills the gap for a small, but extremely high quality carry-everywhere camera.

I am happy with the price. I paid almost the same for a Nikon Coolpix 8400 back in 2004. It was an excellent camera for its time, but the X100 is vastly superior with its APS-C sensor, rich feature set and EVF with more than six times the resolution. X100 cameras on eBay have been selling for double the price within hours of being posted, and I saw one on Amazon yesterday with an asking price of $4,000US. I paid $1,200Cdn for it, and it feels and performs like it is worth every cent. When I picked it up, the whole sales staff and every customer in the place came over to see the box opened. I can not remember any camera since the D3, generating that kind of interest.

Oh, and as an added touch of elegance, the camera comes in a black box, nestled in black satin. ;) Everyone in the store seemed quite impressed. After a bit of shooting, I was impressed as well.
 
Great write up Larry, but where are the pictures???? :)
 
Great write up Larry, but where are the pictures???? :)

Since you asked so nicely, try http://www.larry-bolch.com/ephemeral/x100_01/

These were targets of opportunity as I was setting up and figuring out the camera. The admired it upon arriving, and had the good grace to go on with their lives, ignoring it for the rest of the afternoon. Yup, it is designed for decisive moment and candid work—no doubt.
 
Thanks for the write-up, Larry. I already wanted this camera before I read your review. Now I'm just depressed I don't own it already.
 
Thanks Larry - suspect that you've just sold it to a few folks on here :)
 
I have read a number of reviews as well as a lot of intense chatter on DPReview. If you expect a P&S or a dSLR, it is quirky. If you are coming from a long experience with another brand of camera, it is quirky—Fuji does not use Nikon or Canon menus. Whatever camera you are coming from is the standard camera, that all other cameras should emulate. Viewing sample images, specially from very early prototypes tells little. In fact, viewing sample images tells a lot about the photographer, and very little about the camera—any camera.

When I bought my first digital camera nearly a dozen years ago, the classic Nikon Coolpix 990, I was astounded at the learning curve. The first thousand or so shots were spent learning the camera with the manual in hand. I set up the X100 while walking to a café and was producing good, predictable work within the first dozen or so shots. A week and a half later, I am completely comfortable with it. The point is that there have been six other cameras between the 990 and the X100. After the first shoot, I had a few questions in mind, and the manual answered them. With a bit of study and lots of practice, no camera is quirky for long.
 
Hi Larry
Many thanks for the review...which thanks to Hamish I have discovered subsequent to buying the X100 a couple of days ago. I've stuck some copy and paste stuff on "My Kit".
Couldn't agree more with all you have said, and put so much more elequently than I could have put.
Looking forward to getting over the quirky bit !

Steve
 
We have started stocking the Fuji X100 & having had a go with it I was stunned at the quality it produces, our rep Steve did tell us it was good but until you try it you never know, suppose we should have belived him LOL.
I would say if you want quality & ease of use with out worrying about what lens you need this is for you, an ideal camera for professionals wanting a compact camera.Also the Sigma DP's are worth a look to.
 
We have them at £1060.00 INC VAT & POSTAGE or £1050.00 collected for a complete kit including case & hood etc, just awaiting the filterholder/hoods to arrive but we have the camera & case at present 1 left !!!
 
Think how many rolls of film you could buy and develop for that Hamish! ;)

And when you factor in the time, you will be amazed at how quickly the camera pays for itself. Considering the amount of 35mm and medium format film I shot in a year and all the time I spent in the fume-room or running back and forth to the lab, digital photography has paid back the cost of the equipment quite quickly. Beyond that, it is shooting for free. Not counting time, my film and lab bills for a year were way into the thousands of dollars. By eliminating those costs and applying the savings to cameras, digital photography has cost me nothing over the past dozen years.

I have a print beside me on 8½×11" paper, shot with my D700 at ISO12,800. Noise is visible and about the equivalent of 35mm colour film shot at ISO400-800 when enlarged to that size. Quality at low ISO exceeds my medium format scans. This has opened shooting environments that I could not have dreamed of with film.

I shot this biker-bar essay with Kodak SO2475 Recording film with a Leica M5, f/1.0 50mm Noctilux and f/1.4 35mm Summilux. Even with the fast lenses designed to be used at the widest stops, subject movement was a problem. Even when posted to small web-sized images, grain is profound. Given the ability to shoot up to ISO25,600, the D700 would greatly improve upon grain/noise. However, the grittiness of the images I feel enhances the content in this case. Grain/noise is not something that is bad or good, just part of the photographic medium.

http://www.larry-bolch.com/bike-week/

Even with the smaller sensor, X100 quality rivals that of my D700 at any given ISO at least to 3200. It is certainly very usable to ISO6400, though it will only shoot ISO12,800 with JPEGs. I have tested it and the noise level is quite acceptable—if it is a choice between noise, and no picture at all. I am delighted to post JPEGs on the web, but shoot RAW in camera. JPEG is a great delivery format, but it lacks as a camera format. In all, I find the combination of D700 and X100 to be highly complimentary, and am constantly amazed by the quality the little camera can produce.

I was chronicling the annual pizza feast of a group to which I belong. It was shot in mixed light, daylight through a glass wall facing the parking lot, north light and very cold, mixed with the ambient interior light—mostly compact fluorescent bulbs, though there may have also been incandescent bulbs. The mix varied from place to place along the table, and varied greatly depending upon where the subject was sitting relative to the glass wall.

I shot it with the D700 using 14-bit per channel RAW. I had not intended to use the X100 but out of curiosity, shot a bunch with it as well. In Adobe Camera RAW, I first processed the D700 stuff, using the eyedropper on known neutrals for the initial white balance, then fine tuning it to taste via eyeball. Upon opening the first X100 image, the previous settings resulted in a very wrong looking image. Once again, the eyedropper on a neutral and fine-tune by eyeball.

Being two very different sensors from two manufacturers, I expect that the personalities of the cameras would produce visibly different results no matter how I processed them. I made no attempt to match one against the other, just to satisfy myself. When I posted them on the group's album on Facebook and saw the large thumbnails, I was amazed that there was no sign that they were shot with two different cameras. There were colour variations, depending upon the mix of light, but this was captured in the same way by both cameras.
 
Back
Top