Rob I am the sort of person who reads a lot but remembers little . I can say I came away with the idea that I wished to try this myself and must pick up those filters if I see them lying around cheap. Sorry for being so useless at this time.@Julian de'Courcy - what info did you find?
Very good, Steve. I must get a yellow filter for my Merrills. Subtle effect.
Rob I am the sort of person who reads a lot but remembers little . I can say I came away with the idea that I wished to try this myself and must pick up those filters if I see them lying around cheap. Sorry for being so useless at this time.
Might also be interested in this http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2014/05/sigma-vs-nerd-part-2/
There is a part 1 and 3 from memory
Steve I can assure you in the uk at iso 100 there is almost never the need for, ND filters at f2,8 even though the sigmas top shutter speed is so slow. Lucky you .Great article Julian. I am going to read all three parts when I get back from the dog walk. I am going through my annual gear reduction but the Sigmas are definitely staying. I know I am keeping the Sigmas, the new X100 and the GR. I have gotten really lazy and don't like changing lenses. Plus I always end up using 28mm or 35mm with the occasional 50mm when I am too lazy to walk closer.
Again thanks for posting that. Looking forward to learning more.
The filter comes in heavy when I am using the dogs because I usually shoot wide open then. I also have a 3 stop ND filter for sunny days. My Nikon film camera takes uses 52mm on it's lenses so I just got a step up ring.
Usually get what you pay for Rob, which equates to expensiveAn interesting read, Julian. Thanks for the link. I'll have a look around for a red and a yellow filter. Anyone have suggestions?