More Bladerunner Tech

Chris Dodkin

West Coast Correspondent
Spotted this in today’s LA Times , posted originally by Rob Jenkins, Christie Kerr, PLOS One / December 26, 2013

Can the eyes of photographed crime victims help authorities spot their victimizers?

According to new research published Thursday in the journal PLOS One, high-resolution photographs can be “mined” for hidden information. Specifically, the authors said that photographs of faces can reveal enough visual information on bystanders to identify them.

600




In a small sampling of 32 study participants, test subjects were able to spot familiar faces reflected in the pupils of someone who was photographed 84% of the time, researchers said. When the reflected images were of unfamiliar people, observers were able to match the person to a second mug shot with 71% accuracy.

By zooming in on high-resolution passport-style photographs, we were able to recover images of bystanders from reflections in the eyes of photographic subjects. Performance in the face matching task (Experiment 1) and the spontaneous recognition task (Experiment 2) indicate that these bystander images were not merely informative about facial appearance, they were properly identifiable to viewers who knew the faces.

Reminds me of that scene in Bladerunner, where Deckard can pan around a scanned still photo and find stuff hidden in the mirror and around the corner.

640_mirror.jpg




I guess the future is here – well Bladerunner was set in 2019, so we’re close!
 
Interesting Chris, thanks. And with just a few years to go I reckon there are a few androids already in our midst. I can think of one suspect on this very forum - seeming obsessed with old film technology and claiming Luddite credentials. He's fooling no-one I tell you! ;)

Here's an image from our very own Blanka on the same theme.

http://www.realphotographersforum.com/forum/threads/looking-at-the-mirror.4362/
 
Interesting Chris, thanks. And with just a few years to go I reckon there are a few androids already in our midst. I can think of one suspect on this very forum - seeming obsessed with old film technology and claiming Luddite credentials. He's fooling no-one I tell you! ;)

Wait,...What,...?,...Who...?
 
So the old incredulity circuit is still working then?! ;)
Hell that ain't nuthin' Pete! You shoulda seen me on Christmas morning pretending to be surprised as I was opening up the box with the I-pad Air inside. (The box was taped up pretty good from the factory so I took it into the kitchen to get a knife to cut the tape, but as I did so the lid popped open enough for me to see what was inside. Then I had to go back to the lounge and pretend I hadn't seen anything. It was an Academy Award performance if I do say so myself.:rolleyes:)

Now,...back to the question at hand,...Who are you talking about? :)
 
Hell that ain't nuthin' Pete! You shoulda seen me on Christmas morning pretending to be surprised as I was opening up the box with the I-pad Air inside. (The box was taped up pretty good from the factory so I took it into the kitchen to get a knife to cut the tape, but as I did so the lid popped open enough for me to see what was inside. Then I had to go back to the lounge and pretend I hadn't seen anything. It was an Academy Award performance if I do say so myself.:rolleyes:)

Now,...back to the question at hand,...Who are you talking about? :)
side_oscar.jpg
 
Back
Top