John Marriott
Active Member
I own two Sigma lenses, both of them Nikon fit and both wide angle zooms. The first one is a 17-35mm F2.8 DG lens that was given to me and I have had reasonable results with it on my 35mm film cameras. The build quality is very good but I would say the essential part which is the glass gives acceptable results. I puchased the second lens a 10-20mm f3.5 for use with the smaller sensor Nikons. Again build quality is very good but the glass gives really poor images that require a considerable amount of editing work to bring them anywhere near acceptable. Colour fringing and ghosting are apparent in the image and at wider apertures it is so soft as to border on looking out of focus, when stopped down it is at f16 where there is reasonable (but not good) sharpness, at f22 there is diffraction there so no better that f16. I have read many reviews on this lens which seem to say that the lens is either superb or terrible with not real middle ground. This seems to suggest to me that Sigma have problems with consistency on their lens production line.
Do you or have you had similar experiences with Sigma lenses or this one in particular?
Do you or have you had similar experiences with Sigma lenses or this one in particular?