Dan Cattermole
Dan Down - The Steampunk Womble
Recently, I decided to get my Edixa out from under the bed along with my light meter
http://www.realphotographersforum.com/film-conventional-cameras/10670-going-fully-manual.html
I had the roll processed today and it has turned out pretty well, exposure wise anyway.
The results have come back very 'soft' some out of focus admittedly but I knew that this would be a challenge from the moment Go, especially when there's active children involved and your using a 135mm lens...... then you've got to retake with the light meter because they've moved to the otherside of the living room where it's a bit darker! it's harder than I thought..... but love these little challenges.
I've loaded a roll of Kodak Gold 200 in the cam, but suprised to see that there is little contrast in the shots.
There are all straight from the negative.
I shot all of the exposures wide open, giving it that soft look, not realising it'd be that soft. lol
I might use Dodkins suggestion and carry a small note pad around with me to make a note of my settings.
Now that I know what it looks like at f/2.8 I'm pretty sure to say I'll be knocking it down a few stops.
But I'm quite chuffed that for the total of the 36 frames received including the cost of the film only come to £2.74!! I've got plenty of time to practice!!
Thanks for looking
http://www.realphotographersforum.com/film-conventional-cameras/10670-going-fully-manual.html
I had the roll processed today and it has turned out pretty well, exposure wise anyway.
The results have come back very 'soft' some out of focus admittedly but I knew that this would be a challenge from the moment Go, especially when there's active children involved and your using a 135mm lens...... then you've got to retake with the light meter because they've moved to the otherside of the living room where it's a bit darker! it's harder than I thought..... but love these little challenges.
I've loaded a roll of Kodak Gold 200 in the cam, but suprised to see that there is little contrast in the shots.
There are all straight from the negative.
I shot all of the exposures wide open, giving it that soft look, not realising it'd be that soft. lol
I might use Dodkins suggestion and carry a small note pad around with me to make a note of my settings.
Now that I know what it looks like at f/2.8 I'm pretty sure to say I'll be knocking it down a few stops.
But I'm quite chuffed that for the total of the 36 frames received including the cost of the film only come to £2.74!! I've got plenty of time to practice!!
Thanks for looking