My input is:
1. Keep the horizons straight.
2. What is the point of interest in each photo? #2 has the most interest, #1 and #3 had nothing for me. What would you put as the subject" using the rule of thirds?
Hi Mark,
Although I originally got interested in photography nearly 60 years ago when an auntie gave me her cast off Kodak bellows camera using 128 roll film and was developing and printing my own B&W negs and snaps at 12 years old, my passion for the subject has since subsided and I'm just a 'happy snapper' now
. I take the point about horizons, it's been mentioned before - I know I'm not the only one afflicted by this failure and it has surprised me that, in this digital age, the equivalent of an electronic spiriit level in the view finder isn't a more poular feature (to be turned off by those that don't need it).
The rule of thirds I have always regarded as a guide rather than something to be followed slavishly. I have taken thousands and thousands of photos over the years, most only of interest to me and my family and, IMHO, some of the better ones have driven a cart and horses through the rule of thirds. My primary aim when taking a photo is that it should capture something that I find attractive, rather than be a 'good photo'. I guess that's the difference between a real photographer and a happy snapper, the real photographer is always looking to produce a good photo.
Consequently I regard photo 1 as a lovely scene in it's own right and photo 3 as a comment on some of the regretable decisions that get made when money is able to influence decisions.
Just for the record, I was once an active member of an employer's photographic club and have taken part successfully in inter club competitions but such things hold no interest for me now.
Thanks for your input though, I do enjoy swapping opinions
.
Dave.