Revere Eight Model 88

Chris Dodkin

West Coast Correspondent
Here's the second installment of the diminutive pre-war 8mm cameras - the Revere Eight Model 88.

web.jpg


To say it's similar to the Bell & Howell Sportster would be an understatement - and is of course completely intentional!

Revere was originally a company that manufactured car radiators, but in 1939 they saw the potential that companies like B&H and Kodak had opened up in the new 8mm camera market, and branched out into 8mm camera production.

One their earliest models was the Eight model 88 here - and it was specifically designed to take market share away from the B&H Sportster.

web.jpg


The Model 88 is the same height and width as the Sportster, has the same focal length lens, the same layout, the same features - all be it with a slightly modified case design.

web.jpg


The idea was to undercut the B&H price by half, and steal away market share - and make the camera simple for the man (or woman) in the street to understand and use.

CI1148.jpg


As you can see from this 1942 advert featured on the Vintage Paper Ads website - they succeeded, and bought the camera to market for just $38.50!

web.jpg


As you can see, Revere decided against the complex exposure calculator of the Sportster series, and instead went with a simple exposure chart with some icons to guide the photographer which look surprisingly modern. The reference to Weston 8 film equates to ASA/ISO 10 in modern film speed ratings. Weston had their own scale and light meters at that time, and were the de-facto standard.

web.jpg


The simple instructions even extend to the area behind the aperture ring on the lens - with a helpful cheat sheet of settings for the busy filmmaker.

web.jpg


The lens itself was a fixed focal length Wollensak 13mm f2.5 - and compared reasonably well to the more expensive European glass of the day, at it's much reduced price. Revere later bought Wollensak, and brought lens manufacture and shutter manufacture in-house.

web.jpg


Revere provided some nice visual upgrades over the B&H competition, with chromed dials for FPS and Film Footage - cleverly using the same piece of hardware design for both dials on the Model 88 to keep costs down.

web.jpg


The clockwork winder was almost identical to the Sportster, and featured a nice chrome crank, and a super smooth clockwork spring action - which still feels smooth today.

web.jpg


The only area where the Revere didn't match or exceed the B&H, was on the inside - the layout of the gate and spools was not as neat as the B&H, but by the time you got to open your new Model 88, it was probably already too late for that to be a issue.

web.jpg


The Model 88 was a huge success, and spawned a whole series of cameras, including still cameras, and later electronic cameras with sound and auto exposure.

Revere became the #2 small camera manufacturer behind B&H, and even outsold Kodak in the 1950s.

Wollensak branched out into higher end cameras and audio recording equipment, and the two brands were eventually sold to 3M for a very tidy sum in 1960. ($17M)

The last Wollensak factory closed in 1972, and 3M phased out the Revere brand completely.
 
Last edited:
Ineresting write ups Chris but I do wonder if you're on a slippery slope

I think I've gone all the way down the slope and am now in free fall Paul! ;)

The next, and final, 8mm camera will close the series off nicely, and SWMBO can calm down and stop complaining about all of the parcels arriving from EBAY!

Honest....
 
Once again a super write-up and a very nice looking camera. I do like that strap.

You know, thinking about straps this is the one area where I do think manufactures could improve things. I usually don't fit a strap to my SLR's and just carry them in my hand. I find the straps uncomfortable and a nuisance. I've tried several of the after-market padded, sprung etc, etc straps but they are not much better (just less gaudy). I'm about to give the California Sunbounce strap a go. The leather accessory strap for the Leica is nicely designed but ludicrously expensive (but better than the grippy one supplied) and I have a nice (but very battered) Pentax Asahi strap on one of my film Nikons. The only company that seems to have come up with the perfect solution is Mamiya with the side mounting strap on the 7II. It hangs perfectly and doesn't tip forward and swings up into use without getting caught like so many top-mounted straps do. The hand grips on Hasselblads are excellent too but you wouldn't want to carry one all day! A wedding photographer friend uses a hand strap (probably Hama) on her Canons that is similar in design as she find straps a nuisance also but needs help with the weight of holding a camera for several hours.

Or is it just me? ;)
 
I know what you're saying Pete - I always have a strap on my Canons, but rarely use them

The Revere solution is neat, but is also permanent - no way I can see to remove it.

The B&H Sporter has the same strap, but it screws into the tripod mount with a large chrome knob - so you get the choice of using it or not - but when it's fitted, you can no longer stand the camera on a flat surface!

I do like the idea of the strap buddy, and I know Hamish has them in the shop - anyone care to comment after using one?
 
Back
Top