The Canon T50

Brian Moore

Moderator
Some years ago I got a Canon T50 off E-Bay. It's very basic SLR with few manual controls and indeed, few automatic ones too. Nevertheless, I began shooting with it very regularly just last year and grew to love it. For a while--until I got my long-coveted Oly XA--I took that T50 everywhere.

I wrote a brief blog about it for the "Film Photography Podcast" and they posted it on their site. I thought I would share the article here on RPF. Below is a link to it.

5363966068_21ca98cc03.jpg


http://filmphotographyproject.com/content/2011/01/canon-t-50-amazing-canon-fd-slr-point-shoot-camera
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, I remember that camera!

Love the self portrait in the security mirror :)

Nice write up - how did you get involved with the Film Photography website?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Chris. By the way, the kid behind me in that pic is my older daughter's boyfriend. The people seated in the booth behind him are my younger daughter and my wife.

To answer your question about the podcast, somehow I stumbled on it on-line. If you haven't heard of it you might want to give it a listen. There's a new episode every two weeks and its a lot of fun to listen to. Anyway, they do "give-aways" and I sent them an E-mail asking to be included in one of their give-away drawings. I told them a little about myself and the fact that I do a little writing (at that time I was writing a lot about the EPL for a soccer website) and they invited me to write an article about my Polaroid 210 Land Camera which I got new when I was about 14 or so. I still have that camera and since the guy who hosts the show--Michael Raso--is a big Polaroid fan that subject really interested him.

Since then I've given them a few other articles--the T50, another about my Vivitar PN2011, and another (not yet posted on their site) about the Brownie Hawkeye Flash.

Anyway,...the EPL season started today and as I write this its half time between Liverpool and Sunderland so I'll be getting back to that in a moment.

Thanks again for the comments Chris.
 
My wife had one and I had a T70 which eventually was swapped for a T90, one of my favourite cameras of all time. It was stolen in a break-in and that led to us both moving to the EOS line as insurance-driven replacements.

The best feature of the T90 was multi-spot metering .... that really helped with film exposure.
 
Thanks for the comment, Mike. I heard the T90 is a great camera. Sorry to hear about the break-in, though. I'm guessing you're shooting EOS digital?
 
yup, see sig below. The most frustrating loss was that, at the time, canon did not make a body with multi-point spot focus. I had to wait for the EOS3 (which I actually still have but do not use)
 
I was given a T-50 by a relative who rescued it from the trash can! It looks virtually unused, and has a f1.8 50mm and a lens cap proudly stating that Canon is the official camera of the Olympics. Seems to work fine, I scored the little dedicated flash for it for about $25.00.

For those of you not familiar with the T50 it has essentially no user controls, other than on, off, and battery check. While the camera will set ASA from 25 to 1600, the little flash offers only ASA 100 and 400. The flash sets the synch speed, 1/60, and adjusts the f stop via a measurement taken by an infrared beam. Clever!

If if offered more versatility I might look for FD lenses, but I can't see any real "upgrade" path. So it could be a good shooter for hazardous events, such as the current Occupy Wall Street demonstrations here in the States.

Or, if I could score a 28mm at a good, i. e., cheap price it'd be a good street camera.
 
Those FD lenses do go pretty cheaply, especially third party ones!
I wouldn't have thought you would find it to hard to pick up a 28mm FD fit lens for £5!
Upgrade path... Well there isnt much of one to a digital camera ... But there is th AE1 program!
 
Upgrade path... Well there isnt much of one to a digital camera ... But there is th AE1 program!
They also made a T70, a T80 and the highly-regarded T90.

The last T-series camera was the T60 (I understand it was actually introduced after the EOS system in order to provided a cheap manual camera for some markets.)
 
Well, one or two cheap lenses, maybe. But I'm a Pentaxian, 2 MX, 2 ME Supers, an LX, a K10d, and a pretty complete 645n outfit, in addition to being the custodian of an Asahiflex IIb and several lense for that venerable item. I might be mauled by this gang if I subscribed to the Canonical heresy. :rolleyes:
 
Id be very interested to see some shots from the 645 George!

Here's one.
MFbwimg054_edited-2 by George in Georgia USA, on Flickr

This was taken at Pickney Island Wildlife Preservc in South Carolina, USA. It is a coastal marshland preserve, complete with alligators, herons, and palmetto palms. I scanned this in on an Epson V700 using Betterscanning.com carrier and ANR glass. I use the scanned image mainly as a contact sheet, thus there's little post processing.
Shot on tripod mounted Pentax 645n, 55mm WA, red filter, ASA 400, developed in D-76 1 to 1.

I'll send some others on later. I'm getting used to Flickr; it tends to choke on the big files these negatives generate.
 
Here are a couple more.


MFbw030 by George in Georgia USA, on Flickr

Pentax 645n, 200mm. I couldn't get any closer, and getting closer probably wouldn't have been a good idea!


MFbw018 by George in Georgia USA, on Flickr

Pentax 645n, 55mm at the Pinckney Wildlife Preserve, a salt marsh in coastal South Carolina, USA. Both were taken on ASA 400, D-76 1 to 1. The frond-like plants are saw palmetto, native to southeastern Georgia and further south in marsh areas.
 
How do you find it handles?
Do you tire if the weight over a 35mm camera?
Im really looking to get an mf camera at some point ...
I think i have ruled out a tlr ... as much as i love the c3 i have on loan, i just find it too odd and big to use regularly!
so im weighing up a rf of some sort ... or maybe something like one of these ...
Its the size that i find daunting really!
 
The 645n handles much like a big SLR. Noisier, of course. I'm not sure whether its heavier than a Nikon F series with a motor drive, etc. The motor gives the 645 about 1.5 frames per second. Ken Rockwell has a laudatory writeup: Pentax 645N Ken's prices are sadly out of date.

Pentax Photography & Camera Forum - PentaxForums.com has user reviews of the 645 line. There are three, the 645, 645n which I own, and the 645nii, which adds mirror lockup, considered by The Luminous Landscape, to be unnecessary. The ii is also rarer and much more expensive.

The 645 is menu driven, the 645n and nii aren't. Hoorah! Ken Rockwell's site discusses both the 645 and 645n.

Film inserts rather than magazines are used; no switching mid roll. They come in both 120 and 220 capacities; one can be converted to the other in a few minutes with a jeweler's screwdriver to remove one screw and reverse a plastic piece.

I have only the manual focus lenses; they have a wonderful feel and are all metal, the way God intended lenses to be. A word of warning: since the 645d, the digital model, came out the market has gone wild for 645 lenses since the digital model can use the same lenses. For example a 35mm new old stock (the box even had the warranty card!) for which I paid $550 earlier this year now goes for $1100 or more in used, E condition. Good grief!

The longest lens readily available is a 200mm, not very long. Lenses from the Pentax 67 can be used via an expensive, uncommon Pentax adaptor with full automation. Cheaper adaptors don't give auto diaphragm. Lenses up to I think 600mm were available for the 645, rare and hideously expensive. Pentax 67 lenses range up to I think 800mm - good grief - and are also expensive. Some 67 lenses vignette used on a 645. There ain't no free lunch.

My kit includes the 75mm normal, the 55mm wide angle, the 35mm wide angle, the 120mm macro (continuous focusing to 1 to 1) and the 200mm tele. I also acquired the extention tubes, and the right angle finder. This latter is wonderful for low level shots on a camera with a fixed pentaprism. BTW the camera has two tripod sockets so with two quick release plates going from horizontal to vertical is quick and re-framing isn't needed. A minor stroke of genius in my view.

My whole kit fits into a Lowe MiniTrekker. Very portable but getting a bit heavy. For walk-around I go with the 75 or the 55; not too heavy a load. YMMV, of course.
 
George
I really appriciate your time in responding ...
I just can't get away from this feeling that a 6x6 camera is the right way for me to go ...
 
George
I really appriciate your time in responding ...
I just can't get away from this feeling that a 6x6 camera is the right way for me to go ...
 
Back
Top