Dang...just Missed A Leica M3 On Ebay

Rob MacKillop

Edinburgh Correspondent
With a telephoto lens, excellent condition. I bid up to 500 USD - American seller - but it went for 710USD. Looked gorgeous. Feeling down. Kind of got hooked on it, but I guess I'll survive, sob, sob...
 
Regarding 35mm film cameras - I have a Canon T90, which I could develop by purchasing a couple of decent lenses. On the other hand, like most T90s, it is temperamental, occasionally breaking down, before waking up again. So, I could sell it before I become dependent on it with lenses, and maybe opt for a Nikon F3 or 4.

Advice? I want a good quality 35mm camera with good lenses which don't cost the Earth.
 
I don't know. I'm not 100per cent sure of the difference. The Fuji X100 is described as a rangefinder, but I get the feeling it is not a proper one. Some clarification is needed...
 
this will help http://realphotographersforum.com/forum/threads/voigtlander-bessa-r2a-review.2317/

The biggest factor of RF shooting is that you don't see through the lens ...
This has advantages and disadvantages ...
framing is possibly a little less accurate overall, but you can see outside of the framed area
I have recently found that shooting with my m7 I can frame with my stronger left eye, this is a big advantage for me! (it probably won't be for you)
The cameras are smaller, as are the lenses ... there are a LOT of lenses to play with, but the good ones are dear
there are only three (major) mounts, M, ltm, and NRF/Contax although NRF and contax are actually compatible (http://www.cameraquest.com/NRF-Contax.htm)
ltm is adaptable to M, but not the other way around ... erm, I feel like I am going off on a tangent here ... what else?
 
Certainly it is rangefinder like. With a true RF you often see more than the lens sees through the viewfinder (depending on the lens) plus frame lines that show (approximately) what will be in the shot. You focus by overlapping two images in a small central area of the viewfinder. The advantage is that the view through a RF is often brighter and there is virtually no lag when you press the shutter release as there is no mirror to flip up. With the SLR you see what the lens sees, can often preview depth of field but the view can be much dimmer in low ambient light. SLRs are usually larger and more imposing than a RF.

I thought you had a MF rangefinder didn't you?
 
That's cheap, Pete. Worth it? What lenses could I use with it? Leica, I suppose - expensive. I think the price will rise considerably on the Bessa, but I'll keep an eye on it.
 
Back
Top